Skip to main content
BrainCited

A double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of the stimulating and adaptogenic effect of Rhodiola rosea SHR-5 extract on the fatigue of students caused by stress during an examination period with a repeated low-dose regimen.

A A Spasov, G K Wikman, V B Mandrikov, I A Mironova, V V Neumoin
RCT Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology 2000 251 citazioni
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'braincited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D10839209'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Tipo di studio
Randomized Controlled Trial
Popolazione
general population
Durata
2.9 weeks
Intervento
A double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of the stimulating and adaptogenic effect of Rhodiola rosea SHR-5 extract on the fatigue of students caused by stress during an examination period with a 5 g
Comparatore
placebo
Esito primario
None
Direzione dell'effetto
Positive
Rischio di bias
Moderate

Abstract

The objective was to investigate the stimulating and normalizing effect of the adaptogen Rhodiola rosea extract SHR-5 in foreign students during a stressful examination period. The study was performed as a double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled with low repeated dose regime. The study drug and the placebo were taken for 20 days by the students during an examination period. The physical and mental performance were assessed before and after the period, based on objective as well as on subjective evaluation. The most significant improvement in the SHR-5 group was seen in physical fitness, mental fatigue and neuro-motoric tests (p <0.01). The self-assessment of the general well-being was also significantly (p < 0.05) better in the verum group. No significance was seen in the correction of text tests or a neuro-muscular tapping test. The overall conclusion is that the study drug gave significant results compared to the placebo group but that the dose level probably was suboptimal.

TL;DR

The overall conclusion is that the study drug gave significant results compared to the placebo group but that the dose level probably was suboptimal.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers