Clinical and laboratory evaluation of upper respiratory symptoms in elite athletes.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Cohort Study
- Population
- Sports medicine clinic
- Intervention
- Clinical and laboratory evaluation of upper respiratory symptoms in elite athletes. None
- Comparator
- None
- Primary Outcome
- Clinical and laboratory evaluation of upper respiratory symptoms in elite athlet
- Effect Direction
- Neutral
- Risk of Bias
- Unclear
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the etiology of upper respiratory symptoms in elite athletes presenting to a sports physician for treatment. DESIGN: Prospective clinical and laboratory investigations. SETTING: Sports medicine clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy elite-level athletes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Physician-recorded symptoms and diagnosis; health/training questionnaires; laboratory investigations of respiratory pathogens, white blood cell differential counts, and immune parameters. RESULTS: Physicians characterized 89% of presentations as viral or bacterial upper respiratory tract infection. Only 57% of presentations were associated with an identified pathogen or other laboratory parameters indicative of infection. Demographic information, previous illness, and training history did not distinguish between presentations with or without objective measures of infection. Elevated white blood cell and neutrophil counts and lower vitamin D concentrations partially distinguished infectious episodes. The number of systemic symptoms/behaviors at presentation (cough, headache, earache, fatigue, fever/rigors, myalgia/arthralgia, or cessation of training before clinic attendance) had some predictive value for infection: odds ratio per symptom, 1.23 (90% confidence interval: 0.91 to 1.66); probability of infection, 48% with no symptoms to 77% with 6 symptoms. Laboratory investigation identified allergy in a considerable proportion of the cohort (39%). CONCLUSIONS: The discrepancy between physician and laboratory diagnosed infection in elite athletes highlights the need for consideration of alternate diagnostic options when evaluating upper respiratory symptoms in athletes. A considerable proportion of episodes of respiratory symptoms in athletes were not associated with identification of a respiratory pathogen; other potentially treatable causes of upper respiratory symptoms should be considered, particularly in athletes with recurrent symptoms.
TL;DR
The discrepancy between physician and laboratory diagnosed infection in elite athletes highlights the need for consideration of alternate diagnostic options when evaluating upper respiratory symptoms in athletes.
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
Pharmacological research · 1999
Health benefits of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).
Circulation · 2010
OMEGA, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to test the effect of highly purified omega-3 fatty acids on top of modern guideline-adjusted therapy after myocardial infarction.
Contemporary clinical trials · 2012
The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL): rationale and design of a large randomized controlled trial of vitamin D and marine omega-3 fatty acid supplements for the primary prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease.
Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2011
Role of mercury toxicity in hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and stroke.
Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2008
The effects of omega-3 fatty acids monotherapy in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a preliminary randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007